In real estate, the fine print can make all the difference. A recent Ontario court case, Langen v. Sharma (2024 ONSC 4212), has highlighted how even a seemingly standard contract clause can upend a deal, leaving both buyers and sellers with a costly lesson. At issue: the “entire agreement” clause – a single provision that ultimately determined the fate of a $2.9 million home in Brampton, Ontario.
For realtors, this case serves as a valuable lesson in understanding the nuances of contractual agreements and ensuring that both buyers and sellers are clear on the terms that truly matter.
The Facts
John and Nancy Langen agreed to sell their Brampton home to Rajnish and Veena Sharma for $2.9 million. The Sharmas paid a $100,000 deposit, with the closing scheduled for August 2022. However, the deal fell apart when the Sharmas discovered that the property taxes were significantly higher than what was advertised in the listing. Initially, the Langens stated that the municipal taxes for 2021 were $7,297.03. A reassessment, which took recent renovations into account, revealed the actual taxes were $10,050. Unable to secure the necessary financing due to this unexpected increase, the Sharmas failed to close the transaction.
Forced to resell the property at a $400,000 loss, the Langens sought damages. The Sharmas argued that the discrepancy in tax information was a material misrepresentation, entitling them to rescind the contract and recover their deposit.
The Arguments
The Sharmas contended that the incorrect tax information in the listing was a significant misrepresentation that materially affected their decision to buy the home, justifying their withdrawal from the deal.
However, the Langens pointed to the “entire agreement” clause in their contract. This clause specified that the contract contained the full and final terms of the agreement, and no outside information – such as the details in the listing – could alter those terms.
The Court’s Decision
The court ruled in favour of the Langens, emphasizing the significance of the entire agreement clause. The judge determined that this clause effectively barred the Sharmas’ misrepresentation claim since the inaccurate tax information was not part of the signed agreement. In the end, the contract, as written, stood, and the listing details held no legal weight. The Sharmas were ordered to pay the Langens $425,319.69 in damages, and their deposit was forfeited.
This case is a prime example of why it’s important to understand the difference between what’s in a property listing and what’s in the final contract. The standard OREA form might seem like just another “boilerplate” contract, but every term carries weight and can significantly impact your transactions.
The Langen v. Sharma case is a reminder of the critical difference between what’s in a property listing and what’s in the final contract. In real estate, the mantra “when in doubt, spell it out” couldn’t be more important. Whether it’s the exact property taxes, the condition of the home, or any other detail that might sway a client’s decision, make sure it’s in the agreement. In the end, what’s on paper is what truly matters.
simplyclose is on a mission to make real estate closings as simple and seamless as possible. We leverage our proprietary closing software to make each transaction frictionless. Our lawyers and team of dedicated closing specialist accommodate you throughout each step of the process. Provide your documents through our secure online portal. You can sign your legal documents online through our video conference platform or drop into our office at 625 Erie Street East, Windsor, Ontario N9A 3Y1. We provide real estate legal services to Windsor-Essex County and all across Ontario.
Disclaimer: The information provided on this website does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available on this site are for general informational purposes only. Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. This website contains links to other third-party websites. Such links are only for the convenience of the reader, user or browser; simplyclose does not recommend or endorse the contents of the third-party sites. Readers of this website should contact their attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular legal matter.